...

The change has no equivalent in 3.2 and previous versions as it was not possible then to specify more than one business entity status per registration. The code samples below must therefore not be seen as a translation from 3.2 to 4.0, but as 2 very different information whose purpose is to illustrate the different structures of XML in 3.2 and 4.0.

<com:BusinessEntityStatusCategory>Undiscounted</com:BusinessEntityStatusCategory>

        <dgn:BusinessEntityStatusClaimBag>
          <dgn:BusinessEntityStatusClaim>
            <com:BusinessEntityStatusCategory>Undiscounted</com:BusinessEntityStatusCategory>
            <com:DesignatedCountryCode>IL</com:DesignatedCountryCode>
          </dgn:BusinessEntityStatusClaim>
          <dgn:BusinessEntityStatusClaim>
            <com:BusinessEntityStatusCategory>Undiscounted</com:BusinessEntityStatusCategory>
            <com:DesignatedCountryCode>MX</com:DesignatedCountryCode>
          </dgn:BusinessEntityStatusClaim>
        </dgn:BusinessEntityStatusClaimBag>

4.0 to 7.0

ST.96 7.0 introduces a fair bit of changes as compared to 4.0. For the moment however, only the representative management transactions have been implemented in the Hague System, so that this the only difference at present between ST.96 4.0 and 7.0 where Hague is concerned.

Details about the new representative management transactions can be found here.